DISCOVER DEISM

Discover the Deist in you.

9 THINGS EVERY DEIST SHOULD KNOW

9 Principals that just might make your life better.

3 WAYS PANENDEISM CAN BENEFIT THE WORLD

How Panendeism can positively impact the way we interact with and understand our world.

Unordered List

Showing posts with label education. Show all posts
Showing posts with label education. Show all posts

Monday, August 10, 2015

Separation of Church and State?

The founding fathers' views on religion and government

After the recent flap over the 9th circuit court's pledge decision (ruling the added phrase 'under God,' inserted into the pledge in 1954, to be unconstitutional), I've received a lot of requests for the thoughts of the Founding fathers on the issue of Separation of Church and State. At issue is the belief of many mainstream Christians that separation is a later construct of the courts, and never intended by the founders. Another prominent argument is that the founders only opposed the establishment of one Christian sect over another, and not Christianity as a whole. Yet another popular belief is that the first amendment only applies to laws restricting religion, and that the majority should be able to do as they wish, using references to the 'Creator' in documents as a tacit endorsement of Christianity. I believe all of these arguments to be incorrect, and who better to argue the issue than the principal author of the constitution, founders themselves?

Quotes are arranged in a question/answer format, to highlight common arguments.

Argument one: The phrase 'separation of Church and state' is of recent origin, and the concept was not known or promulgated by the founders.

False. The Founders were well aware of the threats posed by religion/state entanglement; it's what gave the world Kings with "divine right."

The exact phrase was first used in Thomas Jefferson's Letter to the Danbury Baptists, explaining the decision to seperate state and religion:

"Believing with you that religion is a matter which lies solely between man and his God, that he owes account to none other for is faith or his worship, that the legislative powers of government reach actions only, and not opinions, I contemplate with sovereign reverence that act of the whole American people which declared that their legislature should "make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof," thus building a wall of separation between Church and State. Adhering to this expression of the supreme will of the nation in behalf of the rights of conscience, I shall see with sincere satisfaction the progress of those sentiments which tend to restore to man all his natural rights, convinced he has no natural right in opposition to his social duties."

James Madison, principal author of the constitution:

"The civil Government, though bereft of everything like an associated hierarchy, possesses the requisite stability, and performs its functions with complete success, whilst the number, the industry, and the morality of the priesthood, and the devotion of the people, have been manifestly increased by the total separation of the church from the State." (1819).

Argument two: But the founders meant only that no sect of Christianity was to be elevated above another, but still meant our government to be Christian...

"Congress should not establish a religion and enforce the legal observation of it by law, nor compel men to worship God in any manner contrary to their conscience, or that one sect might obtain a pre-eminence, or two combined together, and establish a religion to which they would compel others to conform" (Madison, Annals of Congress, 1789).

"Who does not see that the same authority which can establish Christianity, in exclusion of all other Religions, may establish with the same ease any particular sect of Christians, in exclusion of all other Sects? that the same authority which can force a citizen to contribute three pence only of his property for the support of any one establishment, may force him to conform to any other establishment in all cases whatsoever?" (Madison, Memorial and Remonstrance)

"Because we hold it for a fundamental and undeniable truth, "that religion or the duty which we owe to our Creator and the manner of discharging it, can be directed only by reason and conviction, not by force or violence." The Religion then of every man must be left to the conviction and conscience of every man; and it is the right of every man to exercise it as these may dictate. " (ibid)

"How a regulation so unjust in itself, so foreign to the authority of Congress, and so hurtful to the sale of public land, and smelling so strongly of an antiquated bigotry, could have received the countenance of a committee is truly a matter of astonishment ." (Madison, 1785, letter to James Monroe, on a failed attempt by congress to set aside public funds to support churches)

Argument three: But one of the first acts of Congress was to appoint a Christian chaplain!

This they did do, years before the ratification of the bill of rights. Madison's objection:

"The establishment of the chaplainship to Congs is a palpable violation of equal rights, as well as of Constitutional principles: The tenets of the chaplains elected [by the majority shut the door of worship agst the members whose creeds & consciences forbid a participation in that of the majority. To say nothing of other sects, this is the case with that of Roman Catholics & Quakers who have always had members in one or both of the Legislative branches. Could a Catholic clergyman ever hope to be appointed a Chaplain! To say that his religious principles are obnoxious or that his sect is small, is to lift the evil at once and exhibit in its naked deformity the doctrine that religious truth is to be tested by numbers or that the major sects have a tight to govern the minor. " (Memorial and Remonstrance)

"If Religion consist in voluntary acts of individuals, singly, or voluntarily associated, and it be proper that public functionaries, as well as their Constituents shd discharge their religious duties, let them like their Constituents, do so at their own expense." (Madison, detached memoranda, 1820)

"That religion, or the duty we owe to our Creator, and the manner of discharging it, can be directed only by reason and conviction, not by force or violence; and therefore all men are equally entitled to the free exercise of religion, according to the dictates of conscience." (Patrick Henry)

"I am persuaded, you will permit me to observe that the path of true piety is so plain as to require but little political direction. To this consideration we ought to ascribe the absence of any regulation, respecting religion, from the Magna-Charta [Constitution] of our country" (George Washington, 1789).

"In the course of the opposition to the bill in the House of Delegates, which was warm & strenuous from some of the minority, an experiment was made on the reverence entertained for the name & sanctity of the Saviour, by proposing to insert the words "Jesus Christ" after the words "our lord" in the preamble, the object of which would have been, to imply a restriction of the liberty defined in the Bill, to those professing his religion only. The amendment was discussed, and rejected by a vote of agst." (James Madison, Memorial and Remonstrance)

"Whilst we assert for ourselves a freedom to embrace, to profess and observe the Religion which we believe to be of divine origin, we cannot deny equal freedom to those whose minds have not yet yielded to the evidence which has convinced us. If this freedom be abused, it is an offense against God, not against man: To God, therefore, not to man, must an account of it be rendered." (ibid)

"The appropriation of funds of the United States for the use and support of religious societies, [is] contrary to the article of the Constitution which declares that 'Congress shall make no law respecting a religious establishment'" (James Madison, Veto, 1811)

"It is now no more that toleration is spoken of as if it was by the indulgence of one class of the people that another enjoyed the exercise of their inherent natural rights. For happily the Government of the United States, which gives to bigotry no sanction, to persecution no assistance, requires only that those who live under its protection should demean themselves as good citizens in giving it, on all occasions, their effectual support." (George Washington, letter to the Touro Synagogue 1790. )

"We should begin by setting conscience free. When all men of all religions ... shall enjoy equal liberty, property, and an equal chance for honors and power ... we may expect that improvements will be made in the human character and the state of society." (John Adams)

"The United States of America have exhibited, perhaps, the first example of governments erected on the simple principles of nature; and if men are now sufficiently enlightened to disabuse themselves of artifice, imposture, hypocrisy, and superstition, they will consider this event as an era in their history. Although the detail of the formation of the American governments is at present little known or regarded either in Europe or in America, it may hereafter become an object of curiosity. It will never be pretended that any persons employed in that service had interviews with the gods, or were in any degree under the influence of Heaven, more than those at work upon ships or houses, or laboring in merchandise or agriculture; it will forever be acknowledged that these governments were contrived merely by the use of reason and the senses...." (John Adams, 1787)

"...Thirteen governments [of the original states] thus founded on the natural authority of the people alone, without a pretense of miracle or mystery, and which are destined to spread over the northern part of that whole quarter of the globe, are a great point gained in favor of the rights of mankind." (ibid)

Further quotes:

"As to religion, I hold it to be the indispensable duty of government to protect all conscientious protesters thereof, and I know of no other business government has to do therewith." (Thomas Paine, the Rights of Man)

"All national institutions of churches, whether Jewish, Christian or Turkish [Muslim], appear to me no other than human inventions, set up to terrify and enslave mankind, and monopolize power and profit. I do not mean by this declaration to condemn those who believe otherwise; they have the same right to their belief as I have to mine. But it is necessary to the happiness of man that he be mentally faithful to himself. Infidelity does not consist in believing, or in disbelieving; it consists in professing to believe what he does not believe. It is impossible to calculate the moral mischief, if I may so express it, that mental lying has produced in society. When a man has so far corrupted and prostituted the chastity of his mind as to subscribe his professional belief to things he does not believe, he has prepared himself for the commission of every other crime. He takes up the profession of a priest for the sake of gain, and in order to qualify himself for that trade he begins with a perjury. Can we conceive anything more destructive to morality than this?" (Thomas Paine, The Age of Reason)

 US presidents:

"Let it be henceforth proclaimed to the world that man's conscience was created free; that he is no longer accountable to his fellow man for his religious opinions, being responsible therefore only to his God." (John Tyler)

"I am tolerant of all creeds. Yet if any sect suffered itself to be used for political objects I would meet it by political opposition. In my view church and state should be separate, not only in form, but fact. Religion and politics should not be mingled." (Millard Fillmore)

"When the Know-Nothings get control, it will read: "All men are created equal except negroes, foreigners and Catholics." When it comes to this I should prefer immigrating to some country where they make no pretense of loving liberty--to Russia, for instance, where despotism can be taken pure, and without the base alloy of hypocrisy." (Abraham Lincoln)

"Encourage free schools, and resolve that not one dollar of money shall be appropriated to the support of any sectarian school. Resolve that neither the state nor nation, or both combined, shall support institutions of learning other than those sufficient to afford every child growing up in the land the opportunity of a good common school education, unmixed with sectarian, pagan, or atheistically tenets. Leave the matter of religion to the family altar, the church, and the private schools, supported entirely by private contributions. Keep the church and state forever separated." (Ulysses S. Grant)

"We all agree that neither the Government nor political parties ought to interfere with religious sects. It is equally true that religious sects ought not to interfere with the Government or with political parties. We believe that the cause of good government and the cause of religion suffer by all such interference." (Rutherford B. Hayes)

"The divorce between Church and State ought to be absolute. It ought to be so absolute that no Church property anywhere, in any state or in the nation, should be exempt from equal taxation; for if you exempt the property of any church organization, to that extent you impose a tax upon the whole community." (James A. Garfield)

"Because we are unqualifiedly and without reservation against any system of denominational schools, maintained by the adherents of any creed with the help of state aid, therefore, we as strenuously insist that the public schools shall be free from sectarian influences, and, above all, free from any attitude of hostility to the adherents of any particular creed." (Theodore Roosevelt)

"In the experiences of a year of the Presidency, there has come to me no other such unwelcome impression as the manifest religious intolerance which exists among many of our citizens. I hold it to be a menace to the very liberties we boast and cherish." (Warren G. Harding)

"The fundamental precept of liberty is toleration. We cannot permit any inquisition either from within or from without the law or apply any religious test to the holding of office. The mind of America must be forever free." (Calvin Coolidge.)

"I come of Quaker stock. My ancestors were persecuted for their beliefs. Here they sought and found religious freedom. By blood and conviction I stand for religious tolerance both in act and in spirit." (Herbert C. Hoover)

"The lessons of religious toleration--a toleration which recognizes complete liberty of human thought, liberty of conscience--is one which, by precept and example, must be inculcated in the hearts and minds of all Americans if the institutions of our democracy are to be maintained and perpetuated. We must recognize the fundamental rights of man. There can be no true national life in our democracy unless we give unqualified recognition to freedom of religious worship and freedom of education." (Franklin D. Roosevelt)

"Religious and racial persecution is moronic at all times, perhaps the most idiotic of human stupidities." (Harry S. Truman)

"I believe in an America where the separation of Church and State is absolute--where no Catholic prelate would tell the President (should he be a Catholic) how to act, and no Protestant minister would tell his parishioners for whom to vote--where no church or church school is granted any public funds or political preference--and where no man is denied public office merely because his religion differs from the President who might appoint him or the people who might elect him." (John F. Kennedy)

 Another trend I find disturbing is the use of questionable quotes to support positions that are antithetical to the beliefs of the founders. The following collection are quotes commonly used to support anti-separation arguments, none of which can be verified as genuine. Some are outright fabrications.

Unconfirmed quotes:

"It cannot be emphasized too strongly or too often that this great nation was founded, not by religionists, but by Christians; not on religions, but on the gospel of Jesus Christ." attributed to Patrick Henry

"It is impossible to rightly govern the world without God and the Bible." attributed to George Washington

"Whosoever shall introduce into the public affairs the principles of primitive Christianity will change the face of the world." attributed to Benjamin Franklin

"The principles of all genuine liberty, and of wise laws and administrations are to be drawn from the Bible and sustained by its authority. The man therefore who weakens or destroys the divine authority of that book may be assessory [sic] to all the public disorders which society is doomed to suffer." attributed to Noah Webster

"There are two powers only which are sufficient to control men, and secure the rights of individuals and a peaceable administration; these are the combined force of religion and law, and the force or fear of the bayonet." attributed to Noah Webster

"The only assurance of our nation's safety is to lay our foundation in morality and religion." attributed to Abraham Lincoln

"The philosophy of the school room in one generation will be the philosophy of government in the next." attributed to Abraham Lincoln

"I have always said and always will say that the studious perusal of the Sacred Volume will make us better citizens. " attributed to Thomas Jefferson

False:

"We have staked the whole future of American civilization, nor upon the power of government, far from it. We have staked the future of all of our political institutions upon the capacity of each and all of us to govern ourselves ... according to the Ten Commandments of God."

attributed to James Madison

"Our laws and our institutions must necessarily be based upon and embody the teachings of the redeemer of mankind. It is impossible that it should be otherwise. In this sense and to this extend, our civilizations and our institutions are emphatically Christian." attributed to the The Supreme Court in the Holy Trinity case

"Before any man can be considered as a member of Civil Society, he must be considered as a subject of the Governor of the Universe...Religion... [is] the basis and foundation of government." Misquote of James Madison

"The highest glory of the American Revolution is this; it connected in one indissoluble bond the principles of civil government with the principles of Christianity. " attributed to John Quincy Adams

 Books covering church/state separation issues.

1. Why the Religious Right Is Wrong

An overview of church/state separation issues, and the war of the religious right on the first amendment.

 2. The Godless Constitution: The Case Against Religious Correctness

The Godless Constitution: The Case Against Religious Correctness-A well written argument for continued separation of church and state.
 
3. The Myth of Christian America

Another book exploring the Separation issue and the arguments of the religious right.

 4. Between Church and State

Written by a Clergyman, this book focuses on issues of public education in a multicultural society, and seeks compromise.

Deism and Christianity by Bill McCracken


I thought it would be interesting to consider what Deism shares with the Christian religion. This topic could be a bit tricky because Deists have no set of codified beliefs. We consider ourselves to be free-thinkers, so we don’t tell each other what to believe. But, in a nutshell, Deists believe in God as revealed in nature, and then use reason to determine for ourselves our other personal beliefs and practices. This makes me reluctant to speak for all Deists everywhere, so I’ll just share the similarities that I know of.
 
 In the first place, modern Deism grew out of Christianity. The earliest Deists, at least in America, were members of churches, usually Anglican. They believed in God. They appreciated and tried to follow Jesus’ teachings, especially the Golden Rule and the importance of loving God and others (something I still hold to). But they also realized that the Church held to many beliefs which just didn’t seem to line up with progressive human understanding. For instance, they questioned the doctrine of the Virgin Birth because everyone knows it takes a male and a female to produce a child.
They didn't believe that God impregnates people. They questioned the Christian doctrine that everyone is born evil (Original Sin). They also rejected the doctrine of Substitutionary Atonement, the notion that Jesus had to die in order for God to forgive our sins. So while the Deists affirmed the reality of the Creator and the core teachings of Jesus Christ, they dared to question whether or not Church doctrines or biblical doctrines really line up with reality, with how we know the world really works. But they still affirmed, along with Christians, that God is real and that Jesus taught us how to live good lives.
 Another strong tie that Deism has with what Jesus taught is a reverence for nature. Many, if not most, of Jesus’ parables concerned nature – plants, seeds, tree, water, fire, farming, the sun, the wind. He was quite the “country boy” and used stories about nature to illustrate what human relationships to God and to each other should look like. Like Jesus, Deists looked around them at nature and found, not only evidence for God, but spiritual lessons that can teach us how to love, appreciate, and care for one another.
 Many Deists consider Jesus to be a great teacher, perhaps an extremely enlightened person who had keen insight into how to relate to God as a Father and to humanity as brothers and sisters. Deists also strongly believe in Jesus’ social gospel of helping others. And many Deists, though not all, believe in some sort of afterlife, another subject that Christianity focuses on.
 If Christianity consisted only of the central teachings of Jesus concerning loving God and others, many Deists might consider themselves to be Christians. But Christianity has added many, many other doctrines to its religion over the years that go far beyond what Jesus taught, and Deists find many of these added doctrines to often be irrational, superstitious, and sometimes harmful. Because of all the “extra baggage” that Christianity currently has, most Deists would probably not choose to self-identify as Christians.
As I mentioned in Part 1, Deism in America began in the Church, within Christianity. But it also had a bit of a “love/hate” relationship with Christianity that has not quite abated. Deists affirmed, along with Christians, that God is our Creator and that the creation is good and shows God’s handiwork. And it also often affirmed the central teachings of Jesus about loving God, loving others, and making our world a better place. But it didn’t agree with the Church that all knowledge was confined to the Bible. It didn’t agree with the Church that we had nothing left to learn about ourselves or our universe other than what the Church or the Bible says. Deists embraced the “new knowledge” of the Enlightenment, advances gained in the fields of science, medicine, astronomy, sociology, and even psychology. Deists strongly felt that God was the source of all truth and that God has continued to lead us into truths that people in the Bible days just weren’t privy to. Can you imagine trying to explain to a Roman soldier or a Jewish peasant how an inoculation shot works? Deists embraced these advances in the sciences and in the arts, even in theology (how we think about God), and felt that humanity needed to grow up and out of some of the superstitions of the past.
 
 The Church, to a large degree, was extremely slow in accepting any new knowledge. It felt that everything God wanted us to know was either found in the Bible (for Protestants) or found in the Vatican (for Catholics) or found in the Church Fathers (for Eastern Orthodox). Granted, the Church has made some strides over the last few decades, but let’s be honest, it only recently allowed for inter-racial marriages and it still is opposed to gays “because the Bible says so.” Deists don’t feel that all knowledge is confined to the Bible or the Church. They feel that God teaches us through everything in life and that we should never stop growing. Our beliefs, think most Deists, should come from what we think, given the information and wisdom available to us now, not just residual knowledge held onto simply because people 2000 years ago believed they knew all truth.
 So this is where the relationship between Deism and Christianity can sometimes be strained. Deism accepts and incorporates new knowledge wherever it finds it, using reasoning as a measuring stick to judge truth. Christianity looks primarily to the past for what it believes is truth, to the way people thought and believed from 2000 to 4000 years ago. If you were sick, would you want to go to a doctor that only had the medical training from the first century? Or would you want a doctor with the latest in medical training? Similarly, if you want to understand God, would you consider only what people 2000 years ago had to say? Or would you want to consider other sources? Granted, some things from the past, many things in fact, are worth holding onto. But not if it no longer makes sense (like keeping women out of church pulpits) or if it is superstition (like believing God impregnates people) or if it is harmful, as many of the supposed commands of God in the Bible are.
 Nevertheless, Deism usually does not wish to be “anti-Christian”. Christianity is a good religion, as far as it goes. But not everything in Christianity is good. And Deism wants to be known more for what it is for than what it is against.
 
 
 

Saturday, August 8, 2015

Spirit and Reason



There is nothing intrinsically wrong with religion, but organized religion simply does not work for some people. For many of us, beliefs based on unquestioning faith simply will not stand up to critical analysis…

It is only reasonable to conclude that spirituality fulfills a basic human need. In the hierarchy of needs that he developed, Abraham Maslow called such needs higher needs. Religion has fulfilled the spiritual needs of billions of people, but sometimes at great cost. Religion is a powerful force, and it has not always been a force for good. We can be spiritual, however, without the excess baggage that often may accompany organized religion. Spirituality does not have to be unreasonable.

There is nothing intrinsically wrong with religion, but organized religion simply does not work for some people. For many of us, beliefs based on unquestioning faith simply will not stand up to critical analysis. We cannot “go along to get along”. We do not intend to be impertinent. We love our friends and family and respect their choices, but what is right for them is simply not right for us. And while we respect their choices, sometimes this respect is not returned, because the formerly shared belief system does not permit different ways of thinking. This is unfortunate for those of us who are spiritual but not religious, because what we believe has to be rational, and what we were taught no longer makes sense to us. Leaving your religion presents an awkward situation, and there is no easy way to tell loved ones about this decision. To avoid conflict, some people “fake it” when they visit with parents, other relatives, or friends and do not reveal their decision. After all, as it is said, the nail that sticks out gets pounded flat. But if we are to be true to ourselves we must assert our independence, and this takes courage.

And when we do assert ourselves, we must take care. There is a natural tendency to be critical
when we get up the nerve to break away from our childhood religion. We are so excited we
want to shout it from the mountaintops! We want to point out every flaw, every absurdity,
every false conclusion our old belief system is promoting. Ultimately, though, criticism does not
build anything — it only tears down. Remember that when Socrates asked critical questions in a
debate to deconstruct a person’s beliefs, he did so to get that person’s false notions out of the
way to be replaced by new knowledge. Socrates would lead his debate participant away from
false knowledge and towards some better hypothesis. Not many of us can claim to be as able as
Socrates in a debate.

Many of us place high value on reason and critical thinking, but we must maintain our
perspective. We are humans, not robots, and a healthy view of human reason recognizes our
other human characteristics. We can be overly rational. We cannot ignore the visceral elements
of our being. Without art, music, dance, fantasy, and fiction, our lives would be much poorer.
A life without the fruit of the muses would not be worth living for most of us, and for so very
many of us the same can be said of spirituality.

Thus I am spiritual but not religious, which means I do not subscribe to any mainstream
religion. I have concluded that spirituality is normal and natural. As for organized religion, I just
don’t need all the drama.

Thursday, August 6, 2015

Reason, Intuition and More

Galileo said, "I do not feel obliged to believe that the same God who has endowed us with sense, reason and intellect has intended for us to forego their use." I strongly agree, but I must add that this same God endowed us with imagination, intuition and inspiration. I think we should celebrate all these gifts. In my opinion it is the combination of all these attributes that makes us distinctly human.

I believe our ability to reason is our most important human characteristic. Reason and intellect distinguish us from mere animals. David Pyle said, "Without faith, reason is cold... but without reason faith is blind." Reason alone can be cold. Spock, of Star Trek fame, is the personification of reason, but he is also human. So even though this half-human suppresses his emotions, we can warm to him, because he does not lack imagination, intuition or inspiration.

Our passions can make us all too human when they exceed reasoning's ability to keep them under control. But I would not suggest that we suppress passion too much. At a healthy level it provides drive and energy to push us forward when we encounter obstacles. We know what happens when passion is at its worst. And while you can be too passionate, I don't know that you can be too reasonable, not unless you suppress your other human characteristics.

My notion of God must make sense to me. And life simply makes more sense to me with God than without. My faith is a faith based on reason, but not on reason alone. My intuition tells me it is sensible to bridge the gap between knowing and believing. Nature inspires me to believe that there is a reason that we exist, even if our intellect cannot yet identify that reason. Is it imagination that attributes this mystery to God? Is God simply the name we give to this mystery? I am not so arrogant that I claim to know. I am suspicious of anyone who makes such claims. I claim only to believe, and I don't expect anyone else to believe except on their own terms.

So how can any religion or philosophy ever be true if it treats us as though we are all the same when clearly we are not? If a belief system does not celebrate individuality, I recommend that we proceed with caution. We can benefit from the experience of others, but we must think for ourselves. What works for one may not work for another. We are all born with potential, but we do not have the same beginnings; we should not expect to achieve the same ends through the same means. We are reasoning beings. It doesn't make sense to me that we should ever abandon reason, no matter what. I believe our reason and our intellect should guide us, and I think we should take advantage of all the gifts we are given to reach our full potential. Sense, reason, intellect, imagination, intuition and inspiration are positive qualities I think we all should nurture. Be wary of those who suggest that you should hide or suppress any of these traits. Question whether such people are looking out for your best interests, and consider the possibility that someone else is doing their thinking for them.

Friday, July 31, 2015

Truth by Robert Green Ingersoll

            I.
      Through millions of ages, by countless efforts to satisfy his wants, to gratify his passions, his appetites, man slowly developed his brain, changed two of his feet into hands and forced into the darkness of his brain a few gleams and glimmerings of reason. Hews hindered by ignorance, by fear, by mistakes, and he advanced only as he found the truth the absolute facts. Through countless years he has groped and crawled and struggled and climbed and stumbled toward the light. He has been hindered and delayed and deceived by augurs and prophets by popes and priests. He has been betrayed by saints, misled by apostles and Christ’s, frightened By devils and ghosts enslaved by chiefs and kings robbed by altars and thrones. In the name of education his mind has been filled with mistakes, with miracles, and lies, with the impossible, the absurd and infamous. In the name of religion he has been taught humility and arrogance, love and hatred, forgiveness and revenge.

     But the world is changing. We are tired of barbarian bibles and savage creeds.

     Nothing is greater; nothing is of more importance, than to find amid the errors and darkness of this life, a shining truth.

     Truth is the intellectual wealth of the world.

     The noblest of occupations is to search for truth.

     Truth is the foundation, the superstructure, and the glittering dome of progress.

     Truth is the mother of joy. Truth civilizes, ennobles, and purifies. The grandest ambition that can enter the soul is to know the truth.

     Truth gives man the greatest power for good. Truth is sword and shield. It is the sacred light of the soul.

     The man who finds a truth lights a torch.

     How is Truth to be known?

     By investigation, experiment and reason.
    Every human being should be allowed to investigate to the extent of his desire his ability. The literature of the world should be open to him nothing prohibited, sealed or hidden. No subject can be too sacred to be understood. Each person should be allowed to reach his own conclusions and to speak his honest thought.

     He, who threatens the investigator with punishment here, or hereafter, is an enemy of the human race. And he who tries to bribe the investigator with the promise of eternal joy is a traitor this fellow-men.

     There is no real investigation without freedom, freedom from the fear of gods and men.

     So, all investigation all experiment should be pursued in the light of reason.

     Every man should be true to himself true to the inward light. Each man, in the laboratory of his own mind, and for himself alone, should test the so-called facts the theories of the entire world. Truth, in accordance with his reason, should be his guide and master.

     To love the truth, thus perceived, is mental virtue intellectual purity. This is true manhood. This is freedom.

     To throw away your reason at the command of churches, popes, parties, kings or gods, is to be a serf, a slave.

     It is not simply the right, but it is the duty of every man to think to investigate for himself and every man who tries to prevent this by force or fear, is doing all he can to degrade and enslave his fellowmen.

     Every man should be mentally honest.

     He should preserve as his most precious jewel the perfect veracity of his soul.

     He should examine all questions presented to his mind, without prejudice, unbiased by hatred or love by desire or fear. His object and his only object should be to find the truth. He knows, if he listens to reason, that truth is not dangerous and those errors. He should weigh the evidence, the arguments, in honest scales that passion or interest cannot change. He should care
Nothing for authority nothing for names, customs or creeds nothing for anything that his reason does not say is true.

     Of his world he should be the sovereign, and his soul should wear the purple. From his dominions should be banished the hosts of force and fear.

     He should be Intellectually Hospitable.

     Prejudice, egotism, hatred, contempt, disdain, are the enemies of truth and progress.

The real searcher after truth will not receive the old because it is old, or reject the new because it is new. He will not believe men because they are dead, or contradict them because they are alive. With him an utterance is worth the truth, the reason it contains, without the slightest regard to the author. He may have been a king or serf a philosopher or servant, but the utterance neither gains nor loses in truth or reason. Its value is absolutely independent of the fame or station of the man who gave it to the world.

     Nothing but falsehood needs the assistance of fame and place, of robes and maîtres, of tiaras and crowns. The wise, the really honest and intelligent, are not swayed or governed by numbers by majorities.

     They accept what they really believe to be true. They care nothing for the opinions of ancestors, nothing for creeds, assertions and theories, unless they satisfy the reason.

     In all directions they seek for truth, and when found, accept it with joy accept it in spite of preconceived opinions in spite of prejudice and hatred.

     This is the course pursued by wise and honest men, and no other course is possible for them.

     In every department of human endeavor men are seeking for the truth for the facts. The statesman reads the history of the world, gathers the statistics of all nations to the end that his country may avoid the mistakes of the past. The geologist
Penetrates the rocks in search of facts climbs mountains, visits the extinct craters, traverses islands and continents that he may know something of the history of the world. He wants the truth.

     The chemist, with crucible and retort, with countless experiments, is trying to find the qualities of substances travel what nature has woven.

     The great mechanics dwell in the realm of the real. They seek By natural means to conquer and use the forces of nature. They want the truth the actual facts.

     The physicians, the surgeons, rely on observation, experiment and reason. They become acquainted with the human body with muscle, blood and nerve with the wonders of the brain. They want nothing but the truth.

     And so it is with the students of every science. On every hand they look for facts, and it is of the utmost importance that they give to the world the facts they find.

     Their courage should equal their intelligence. No matter what the dead have said, or the living believe, they should tell what they know. They should have intellectual courage.

     If it be good for man to find the truth good for him to be intellectually honest and hospitable, then it is good for others to know the truths thus found.
Every man should have the courage to give his honest thought.
This makes the finder and publisher of truth a public benefactor.

     Those who prevent, or try to prevent, the expression of honest thought, are the foes of civilization the enemies of truth.
Nothing can exceed the egotism and impudence of the man who claims the right to express his thought and denies the same right to others.

     It will not do to say that certain ideas are sacred, and that man has not the right to investigate and test these ideas for himself.

     Who knows that they are sacred? Can anything be sacred to us that we do not know to be true?

     For many centuries free speech has been an insult to God.
Nothing has been more blasphemous than the expression of honest thought. For many ages the lips of the wise were sealed. The Torches that truth had lighted, that courage carried and held aloft, were extinguished with blood.

     Truth has always been in favor of free speech has always asked to be investigated has always longed to be known and understood.
Freedom, discussion, honesty, investigation and courage are the friends and allies of truth. Truth loves the light and the open field. It appeals to the senses to the judgment, the reason, toll the higher and nobler faculties and powers of the mind. It seeks to calm the passions, to destroy prejudice and to increase the volume and intensity of reason's flame.

     It does not ask man to cringe or crawl. It does not desire the worship of the ignorant or the prayers and praises of the frightened. It says to every human being, "Think for you.
Enjoy the freedom of a god, and have the goodness and the courage to express your honest thought."

     Why should we pursue the truth? And why should we investigate and reason? And why should we be mentally honest and hospitable?
And why should we express our honest thoughts? To this there is butane answer: for the benefit of mankind.

     The brain us be developed. The world must think. Speech must
Be free. The world must learn that credulity is not a virtue and that no question is settled until reason is fully satisfied.

     By these means man will overcome many of the obstructions of nature. He will cure or avoid many diseases. He will lessen pain.
He will lengthen, ennoble and enrich life. In every direction he will increase his power. He will satisfy his wants, gratify his tastes. He will put roof and raiment, food and fuel, home and happiness within the reach of all.

     He will drive want and crime from the world. He will destroy the serpents of fear, the monsters of superstition. He will become intelligent and free, honest and serene.

The monarch of the skies will be dethroned the flames of hell will be extinguished. Pious beggars will become honest and useful men. Hypocrisy will collect no tolls from fear, lies will not be regarded as sacred, this life will not be sacrificed for another, human beings will love each other instead of gods, men will do right, not for the sake of reward in some other world, but for the sake of happiness here. Man will find that Nature is the only revelation, and that he, by his own efforts, must learn to read the stories told by star and cloud, by rock and soil, by sea and stream, by rain and fire, by plant and flower, by life in all its curious forms, and all the things and forces of the world.

     When he reads these stories, these records, he will know that man must rely on himself that the supernatural does not exist, and that man must be the providence of man.

     It is impossible to conceive of an argument against the freedom of thought against maintaining your self-respect and preserving the spotless and stainless veracity of the soul.

                               II

     All that I have said seems to be true almost self-evident, and you may ask who it is that says slavery is better than liberty. Let me tell you.

     All the popes and priests, all the orthodox churches and clergymen, say that they have a revelation from God.

     The Protestants say that it is the duty of every person to read, to understand, and to believe this revelation that a man should use his reason; but if he honestly concludes that the Bibles not a revelation from God, and dies with that conclusion in his mind, he will be tormented forever. They say: "Read," and then add: "Believe, or be damned."

     "No matter how unreasonable the Bible may appear to you, you must believe. No matter how impossible the miracles may seem, you must believe. No matter how cruel the laws, your heart must approve them all!"

     This is what the church calls the liberty of thought.

     We read the Bible under the scowl and threat of God. We read by the glare of hell. On one side is the devil, with the instruments of torture in his hands. On the other, God, ready to launch the infinite curse. And the church says to the readers: "You’re free to decide. God is good, and he gives you the liberty to choose."

     The popes and the priests say to the poor people: "You need not read the Bible. You cannot understand it. That is the reason it’s called a revelation. We will read it for you, and you must believe what we say. We carry the key of hell. Contradict us adieu will become eternal convicts in the prison of God."

     This is the freedom of the Catholic Church.
And all these priests and clergymen insist that the Bible is superior to human reason that it is the duty of man to accept it to believe it, whether he really thinks it is true or not, and without the slightest regard to evidence or reason.

     It is his duty to cast out from the temple of his soul the goddess Reason, and bow before the coiled serpent of Fear.

     This is what the church calls virtue.

     Under these conditions what can thought be worth? The brain, swept by the sirocco of God's curse, becomes a desert.

     But this is not all. To compel man to desert the standard of Reason, the church does not entirely rely on the threat of eternal pain to be endured in another world, but holds out the reward of everlasting joy.

     To those who believe, it promises the endless ecstasies of heaven. If it cannot frighten, it will bribe. It relies on fear and hope.

     A religion, to command the respect of intelligent men, should rest on a foundation of established facts. It should appeal, not to Passion, not to hope and fear, but to the judgment. It should ask that all the faculties of the mind, all the senses, should assemble and take counsel together, and that its claims be passed upon and tested without prejudice, without fear, in the calm of perfect candor.

     But the church cries: "Believe on the Lord Jesus Christ and thou shalt be saved." Without this belief there is no salvation.
Salvation is the reward for belief.

     Belief is, and forever must be, the result of evidence. Promised reward is not evidence. It sheds no intellectual light. It establishes no fact, answers no objection, and dissipates no doubt.

     Is it honest to offer a reward for belief?

     The man who gives money to a judge or juror for a decision or verdict is guilty of a crime. Why? Because he induces the judge, the juror, to decide, not according to the law, to the facts, the right, but according to the bribe.

     The bribe is not evidence.

     So, the promise of Christ to reward those who will believe Isa bribe. It is an attempt to make a promise take the place of evidence. He who says that he believes, and does this for the sake of the reward, corrupts his soul.

     Suppose I should say that at the center of the earth there Isa diamond one hundred miles in diameter, and that I would give ten thousand dollars to any man who would believe my statement. Could such a promise be regarded as evidence?
Intelligent people would ask not for rewards, but reasons. Only hypocrites would ask for the money.

     Yet, according to the New Testament, Christ offered a reward to those who would believe, and this promised reward was to take the place of evidence. When Christ made this promise he forgot, ignored, or held in contempt the rectitude of a brave, free and natural soul.

     The declaration that salvation is the reward for belief is inconsistent with mental freedom, and could have been made by no man who thought that evidence sustained the slightest relation to belief.

     Every sermon in which men have been told that they could save their souls by believing, has been an injury. Such sermons dull the moral sense and subvert the true conception of virtue and duty.

     The true man, when asked to believe, asks for evidence. The true man, who asks another to believe, offers evidence.

     But this is not all.

     In spite of the threat of eternal pain of the promise of everlasting joy, unbelievers increased, and the churches took another step.

     The churches said to the unbelievers, the heretics: "Although our God will punish you forever in another world in his prison the doors of which open only to receive, we, unless you believe, will torment you now."

     And then the members of these churches, led by priests, popes, and clergymen, sought out their unbelieving neighbors chained them in dungeons, stretched them on racks, crushed their bones, cutout their tongues, extinguished their eyes, flayed them alive and consumed their poor bodies in flames.

     All this was done because these Christian savages believed in the dogma of eternal pain. Because they believed that heaven waste reward for belief. So believing, they were the enemies of free thought and speech they cared nothing for conscience, nothing for the veracity of a soul, nothing for the manhood of a man. In all ages most priests have been heartless and relentless. They have calumniated and tortured. In defeat they have crawled and whined.
In victory they have killed. The flower of pity never blossomed in their hearts and in their brain. Justice never held aloft the scales. Now they are not as cruel. They have lost their power, but they are still trying to accomplish the impossible. They fill their pockets with "fool's gold" and think they are rich. They stuff their minds with mistakes and think they are wise. They console themselves with legends and myths, have faith in fiction and forgery give their hearts to ghosts and phantoms and seek the aid of the non-existent.

     They put a monster a master a tyrant in the sky, and seek to enslave their fellow-men. They teach the cringing virtues of serfs. They abhor the courage of manly men. They hate the man who thinks. They long for revenge.

     They warm their hands at the imaginary fires of hell.

     I show them that hell does not exist and they denounce me for destroying their consolation.

     Horace Greeley, as the story goes, one cold day went into country store, took a seat by the stove, unbuttoned his coat and spread out his hands.

     In a few minutes, a little boy who clerked in the store said:"Mr.Greeley,theren't no fire in that stove."

     "You d--d little rascal," said Greeley, "What did you tell me for, I was getting real warm."

                               III

                   "THE SCIENCE OF THEOLOGY."

     All the sciences except Theology are eager for facts hungry for the truth. On the brow of a finder of a fact the laurels placed.

     In a theological seminary, if a professor finds a fact inconsistent with the creed, he must keep it secret or deny it, or lose his place. Mental veracity is a crime, cowardice and hypocrisy are virtues.

     A fact, inconsistent with the creed, is denounced as a lie, and the man who declares or announces the fact is a blasphemer.
Every professor breathes the air of insincerity. Everyone is mentally dishonest. Everyone is a pious fraud. Theology is the only dishonest science the only one that is based on belief on credulity, the only one that abhors investigation that despises thought and denounces reason.

     All the great theologians in the Catholic Church have denounced reason as the light furnished by the enemy of mankind as the road that leads to perdition. All the great Protestant theologians, from Luther to the orthodox clergy of our time, have been the enemies of reason. All orthodox churches of all ages have been the enemies of science. They attacked the astronomers although they were criminals the geologists as though they were assassins. They regarded physicians as the enemies of God as men who were trying to defeat the decrees of Providence. The biologists, the anthropologists, the archaeologists, the readers of ancient inscriptions, the delvers in buried cities, were all hated by the theologians. They were afraid that these men might find something inconsistent with the Bible.

     The theologians attacked those who studied other religions.
They insisted that Christianity was not a growth not an evolution but a revelation. They denied that it was in any way connected with any natural religion.
     The facts now show beyond all doubt that all religions came from substantially the same source but there is not an orthodox Christian theologian who will admit the facts. He must defend his creed his revelation. He cannot afford to be honest. He was not educated in an honest school. He was not taught to be honest. Hews taught to believe and to defend his belief, not only against argument but against facts.

     There is not a theologian in the whole world that can produce the slightest, the least particle of evidence tending to show that the Bible is the inspired word of God.

     Where is the evidence that the book of Ruth was written by an inspired man? Where is the evidence that God is the author of the Song of Solomon? Where is the evidence that any human being has been inspired? Where is the evidence that Christ was and is God?
Where is the evidence that the places called heaven and hell exist?
Where is the evidence that a miracle was ever wrought?

     There is none.

     Theology is entirely independent of evidence.

     Where is the evidence that angels and ghosts that devils and gods exist? Have these beings been seen or touched? Does one of our senses certify to their existence?

     The theologians depend on assertions. They have no evidence.
They claim that their inspired book is superior to reason and independent of evidence.

     They talk about probability analogy inferences but they present no evidence. They say that they know that Christ lived, in the same way that they know that Caesar lived. They might add that they know Moses talked with Jehovah on Sinai the same way they know that Brigham Young talked with God in Utah. The evidence
In both cases is the same, none in either.

     How do they prove that Christ rose from the dead? They find the account in a book. Who wrote the book? They do not know. What evidence is this? None, unless all things found in books are true.

     It is impossible to establish one miracle except by another and that would have to be established by another still, and so on without end. Human testimony is not sufficient to establish miracle. Each human being, to be really convinced, must witness the miracle for himself.

     They say that Christianity was established, proven to be true, and by miracles wrought nearly two thousand years ago. Not one of these miracles can be established except by impudent and ignorant assertion except by poisoning and deforming the minds of the ignorant and the young. To succeed, the theologians invade the cradle, the nursery. In the brain of innocence they plant the seeds of superstition. They pollute the minds and imaginations of children. They frighten the happy with threats of pain  they soothe the wretched with gilded lies.
     This perpetual insincerity stamps itself on the face affects every feature. We all know the theological countenance, cold, unsympathetic, cruel, and lighted with a pious smirk,  no line of laughter no dimpled mirth no touch of humor nothing human.

     This face is a rebuke, a reprimand to natural joy. It says tithe happy: "Beware of the dog" "Prepare for death." This face, like the fabled Gorgon, turns cheerfulness to stone. It is a protest against pleasure a warning and a threat.

     You see every soul is a sculptor that fashions the features, and in this way reveals itself.

     Every thought leaves its impress. The student of this science of theology must be taught in youth, in his mother's arms. These lies must be sown and planted in his brain the first of all. He must be taught to believe, to accept without question. He must be told that it is wicked to doubt, that it is sinful to inquire that Faith is a virtue and unbelief a crime.

     In this way his mind is poisoned, paralyzed. On all other subjects he has liberty and in all other directions he is urged to study and think. From his mother's arms he goes to the Sunday school. His poor little mind is filled with miracles and wonders.
He is told about a God who made the world and who rewards and punishes. He is told that this God is the author of the Bible that Christ is his son. He is told about original sin and the atonement, and he believes what he hears. No reasons are given any facts no evidence is presented nothing but assertion. If he asks questions, he is silenced by more solemn assertions and warned against the devices of the evil one. Every Sunday school Isa kind of inquisition where they torture and deform the minds of children where they force their souls into Catholic or
Protestant molds and do all they can to destroy the originality, the individuality, and the veracity of the soul. In the theological seminary the destruction is complete.

     When the minister leaves the seminary, he is not seeking the truth. He has it. He has a revelation from God, and he has a creed in exact accordance with that revelation. His business is to standby that revelation and to defend that creed. Arguments against the revelation and the creed he will not read. He will not hear. All facts that are against his religion he will deny. It is impossible for him to be candid. The tremendous "verities" of eternal joy, of everlasting pain are in his creed, and they result from believing the false and denying the true.

     Investigation is an infinite danger, unbelief is an infinite offence and deserves and will receive infinite punishment. In the shadow of this tremendous "fact" his courage dies, his manhood is lost, and in his fear he cries out that he believes, whether heroes or not.

     He says and teaches that credulity is safe and thought dangerous. Yet he pretends to be a teacher a leader, one selected by God to educate his fellow-men.
     These orthodox ministers have been the slanderers of the really great men of our century. They denounced Lyell. The great geologist, for giving facts to the world. They hated and belittled Humboldt, one of the greatest and most intellectual of the race.
They ridiculed and derided Darwin, the greatest naturalist, the keenest observer, the best judge of the value of a fact, the most wonderful discoverer of truth that the world has produced.

     In every orthodox pulpit stood a traducer of the greatest of scientists of one who filled the world with intellectual light.

     The church has been the enemy of every science, of every real thinker, and for many centuries has used her power to prevent intellectual progress.

     Ministers ought to be free. They should be the heralds of the ever coming day, but they are the bats, the owls that inhabit ruins, that hate the light. They denounce honest men who express their thoughts, as blasphemers, and do what they can to close their mouths. For their Bible they ask the protection of law. They wish to be shielded from laughter by the Legislature. They ask that the arguments of their opponents be answered by the courts. This is the result of a due admixture of cowardice, hypocrisy and malice.

     What valuable fact has been proclaimed from an orthodox pulpit? What ecclesiastical council has added to the intellectual wealth of the world?

     Many centuries ago the church gave to Christendom a code of laws, stupid, unphilosophical and brutal to the last degree.

     The church insists that it has made man merciful and just. Digit do this by torturing heretics by extinguishing their eyes by flaying them alive? Did it accomplish this result through the Inquisition by the use of the thumb-screw, the rack and the fagot? Of what science has the church been the friend and champion?
What orthodox church has opened its doors to a persecuted truth? Of what use has Christianity been to man?

     They tell us that the church has been and is the friend of education. I deny it. The church founded colleges not to educate men, but to make proselytes, converts, defenders. This was in accordance with the instinct of self-preservation. No orthodox
church ever was, or ever will be in favor of real education. Catholic is in favor of enough education to make a Catholic out of savage, and the Protestant is in favor of enough education to make a Protestant out of a Catholic, but both are opposed to the education that makes free and manly men.

     So, ministers say that they teach charity. This is natural.
They live on alms. All beggars teach that others should give.

     So, they tell us that the church has built hospitals. This is not true. Men have not built hospitals because they were Christians, but because they were men. They have not built them for charity but in self-defense. If a man comes to your door with the smallpox, you cannot let him in, you cannot kill him. As necessity, you provide a place for him. And you do this to protect yourself. With this Christianity has had nothing to do.

     The church cannot give, because it does not produce. It is claimed that the church has made men and women forgiving. I admit that the church has preached forgiveness, but it has never forgiven an enemy never. Against the great and brave thinkers it has coined and circulated countless lies. Never has the church told, or tried to tell, the truth about an honest foe.

     The church teaches the existence of the Supernatural.
It believes in the divine sleight-of-hand in the "presto" and "open sesame" of the Infinite; in some invisible Being who produces effects without causes and causes without effects; whose caprice governs the world and who can be persuaded by prayer, softened by ceremony, and who will, as a reward for faith, save men from the natural consequences of their actions.

     The church denies the eternal, inexorable sequence of events.

     What Good has the Church Accomplished?

     It claims to have preached peace because its founder said, "Came not to bring peace but a sword."

     It claims to have preserved the family because its founder offered a hundred-fold here and life everlasting to those who would desert wife and children.

     So, it claims to have taught the brotherhood of man and that the gospel is for the entire world, because Christ said to the woman of Samaria that he came only to the lost sheep of the house of Israel, and declared that it was not meet to take the bread of the children and cast it unto dogs.

     In the name of Christ, who threatened eternal revenge. it has preached forgiveness.

     Of what use are the Orthodox Ministers?

     They are the enemies of pleasure. They denounce dancing as one of the deadly sins. They are shocked at the wickedness of the waltz the pollution of the polka. They are the enemies of the theater.
They slander actors and actresses. They hate them because they arrivals. They are trying to preserve the sacredness of the Sabbath.
It fills them with malice to see the people happy on that day. They preach against excursions and picnics against those who seek the woods and the sea, the shadows and the waves. They are filled withhold wrath against bicycles and bloomers. They are opposed to divorces. They insist that for the glory of God, husbands and wives who loathe each other should be compelled to live together. They abhor all works of fiction, and love the Bible. They declare that the literary master-pieces of the world are unfit to be read. They think that the people should be satisfied with sermons and poems about death and hell. They hate art abhor the marbles of the Greeks, and all representations of the human form. They want nothing painted or sculptured but hands, faces and clothes. Most of the priests are prudes, and publicly denounce what they secretly admire and enjoy. In the presence of the nude they cover their faces with their holy hands, but keep their fingers apart. They pretend to believe in moral suasion, and want everything regulated by law. If they had the power, they would prohibit everything that men and women really enjoy. They want libraries, museums and art galleries closed on the Sabbath. They would abolish the Sunday paper stop the running of cars and all public conveyances on the holy day, and compel all the people to enjoy sermons, prayers and psalms.

     These dear ministers, when they have poor congregations, thunder against trusts, syndicates, and corporations against wealth, fashion and luxury. They tell about Dives and Lazarus, paint rich men in hell and beggars in heaven. If their congregations are rich they turn their guns in the other direction.

     They have no confidence in education in the development of the brain. They appeal to hopes and fears. They ask no one to think to investigate. They insist that all shall believe. Credulity is the greatest of virtues, and doubt the deadliest of sins.

     These men are the enemies of science of intellectual progress. They ridicule and calumniate the great thinkers. They deny everything those conflicts with the "sacred Scriptures." They still believe in the astronomy of Joshua and the geology of Moses.
They believe in the miracles of the past, and deny the demonstrations of the present. They are the foes of facts  the enemies of knowledge. A desire to be happy here, they regard as wicked and worldly but a desire to be happy in another world, as virtuous and spiritual.

     Every orthodox church is founded on mistake and falsehood. Every good orthodox minister asserts what he does not know, and denies what he does know.

     What are the Orthodox Clergy Doing for the good of Mankind?

     Absolutely nothing.

     What harm are they doing?

     On every hand they sow the seeds of superstition. They paralyze the minds, and pollute the imaginations of children. They fill their hearts with fear. By their teachings, thousands become insane. With them, hypocrisy is respectable and candor infamous.
They enslave the minds of men. Under their teachings men waste and misdirect their energies, abandon the ends that can be accomplished, dedicate their lives to the impossible, worship the unknown, pray to the inconceivable, and become the trembling slaves of a monstrous myth born of ignorance and fashioned by the trembling hands of fear.

     Superstition is the serpent that crawls and hisses in every Eden and fastens its poisonous fangs in the hearts of men.
     It is the deadliest foe of the human race.

     Superstition is a beggar a robber, a tyrant.

     Science is a benefactor.

     Superstition sheds blood.

     Science sheds light.

     The dear preachers must give up the account of creation the Garden of Eden, the mud-man, the rib-woman, and the walking, talking, snake. They must throw away the apple, the fall of man, the expulsion, and the gate guarded by angels armed with swords.
They must give up the flood and the tower of Babel and the confusion of tongues. They must give up Abraham and the wrestling match between Jacob and the Lord. So, the story of Joseph, the enslavement of the Hebrews by the Egyptians, the story of Moses in the bulrushes, the burning bush, the turning of sticks into serpents, of water into blood, the miraculous creation of frogs, the killing of cattle with hail and changing dust into lice, all must be given up. The sojourn of forty years in the desert, the opening of the Red Sea, the clothes and shoes that refused to wear out, the manna, the quails and the serpents, the water that ran uphill, the talking of Jehovah with Moses face to face, the giving of the Ten Commandments, the opening of the earth to swallow the enemies of Moses all must be thrown away.

     These good preachers must admit that blowing horns could not throw down the walls of a city, that it was horrible for Jephthah to sacrifice his daughter, that the day was not lengthened and the moon stopped for the sake of Joshua, that the dead Samuel was not raised by a witch, that a man was not carried to heaven in chariot of fire, that the river Jordan was not divided by the stroke of a cloak, that the bears did not destroy children for laughing at a prophet, that a wandering soothsayer did not collect lightnings from heaven to destroy the lives of innocent men, that he did not cause rain and make iron float, that ravens did not keep hotel where preachers got bored and lodging free, that the shadow on a dial was not turned back ten degrees to show that a king was going to recover from a boil, that Ezekiel was not told by God how to prepare a dinner, that Jonah did not take cabin passage in fish and that all the miracles in the old Testament are not allegories, or poems, but just old-fashioned lies. And the dear preachers will be compelled to admit that there never was a miraculous babe without a natural father, that Christ, if he lived, was a man and nothing more. That he did not cast devils out of folks  that he did not cure blindness with spittle and clay, nor turn water into wine, nor make fishes and loaves of bread out of nothing that he did not know where to catch fishes with money in their mouths that he did not take a walk on the water that he did not at will become invisible that he did not pass through closed doors that he did not raise the dead that angels never rolled stones from a sepulcher that Christ did not rise from the dead and did not ascend to heaven.

     All these mistakes and illusions and delusions all these miracles and myths must fade from the minds of intelligent men.
My dear preachers, I beg you to tell the truth. Tell your congregations that Moses was not the author of the Pentateuch. Tell them that nobody knows who wrote the five books. Tell them that Deuteronomy was not written until about six hundred years before
Christ. Tell them that nobody knows who wrote Joshua, or Judges, or Ruth, Samuel, Kings, or Chronicles, Job, or the Psalms, or the Song of Solomon. Be honest, tell the truth. Tell them that nobody knows who wrote Esther which Ecclesiastes was written long after Christ that many of the prophecies were written after the events pretended to be foretold had happened. Tell them that Ezekiel and Daniel were insane. Tell them that nobody knows who wrote the gospels, and tell them that no line about Christ written by contemporary has been found. Tell them it is all guess and maybe, and perhaps. Be honest. Tell the truth, develop your brains, use all your senses and hold high the torch of Reason.

     In a few years the pulpits will be filled with teachers instead of preachers with thoughtful brave, and honest men. The congregations will be civilized intellectually honest and hospitable.

     Now, most of the ministers insist that the old falsehoods shall be treated with reverence that ancient lies with long white beards wrinkled and bald-headed frauds round-shouldered and toothless miracles, and palsied mistakes on crutches, shall be called allegories, parables, oriental imagery, and inspired poems. In their presence the ungodly should remove their hats. They should respect the mound and moss of antiquity. They should remember that these lies, these frauds, the miracles and mistakes, have for thousands of years ruled, enslaved, and corrupted the human race.

     These ministers ought to know that their creeds are based on imagined facts and demonstrated by assertion.

     They ought to know that they have no evidence, nothing but promises and threats. They ought to know that it is impossible to conceive of force existing without and before matter that it is equally impossible to conceive of matter without force that it’s impossible to conceive of the creation or destruction of matter or force, that it is impossible to conceive of infinite intelligence dwelling from eternity in infinite space, and that it’s impossible to conceive of the creator, or creation, of substance.

     The God of the Christian is an enthroned guess a perhaps an inference.

     No man, and no body of men, can answer the questions of the Whence and Whither. The mystery of existence cannot be explained byte intellect of man.

     Back of life, of existence, we cannot go beyond death we cannot see. All duties, all obligations, all knowledge, all experience, are for this life, for this world.

     We know that men and women and children exist. We know that happiness, for the most part, depends on conduct.
     We are satisfied that all the gods are phantoms and that the supernatural does not exist.

     We know the difference between hope and knowledge, we hope for happiness here and we dream of joy hereafter, but we do not know.
We cannot assert, we can only hope. We can have our dream. In the wide night our star can shine and shed its radiance on the graves of those we love. We can bend above our pallid dead and say that beyond this life there are no sighs no tears no breaking hearts.

                           CONCLUSION.

     Let us be honest. Let us preserve the veracity of our souls.
Let education commence in the cradle in the lap of the loving mother. This is the first school. The teacher, the mother, should be absolutely honest.

     The nursery should not be an asylum for lies.

     Parents should be modest enough to be truthful honest enough to admit their ignorance. Nothing should be taught as true that cannot be demonstrated.

     Every child should be taught to doubt, to inquire, to demand reasons. Every soul should defend itself should be on its guard against falsehood, deceit, and mistake, and should beware of all kinds of confidence men, including those in the pulpit.

     Children should be taught to express their doubts -- to demand reasons. The object of education should be to develop the brain, to quicken the senses. Every school should be a mental gymnasium. The child should be equipped for the battle of life. Credulity, implicit obedience, are the virtues of slaves and the en-slaves of the free. All should be taught that there is nothing too sacred tube investigated too holy to be understood.

     Each mind has the right to lift all curtains, withdraw all veils, scale all walls, explore all recesses, all heights, and all depths for itself, in spite of church or priest, or creed or book.

     The great volume of Nature should be open to all. None but the intelligent and honest can really read this book. Prejudice clouds
and darkens every page. Hypocrisy reads and misquotes, and credulity accepts the quotation. Superstition cannot read a line or spell the shortest word. And yet this volume holds all knowledge, all truth, and is the only source of thought. Mental liberty means the right of all to read this book. Here the Pope and Peasant are equal. Each must read for himself and each ought honestly and fearlessly to give to his fellow-men what he learns.

     There is no authority in churches or priests no authority in numbers or majorities. The only authority is Nature the facts we know. Facts are the masters, the enemies of the ignorant, the servants and friends of the intelligent.

     Ignorance is the mother of mystery and misery, of superstition and sorrow, of waste and want.

Intelligence is the only light. It enables us to keep to the highway, to avoid the obstructions, and to take advantage of the forces of nature. It is the only lever capable of raising mankind.
To develop the brain is to civilize the world. Intelligence reeves the heavens of winged and frightful monsters drives ghosts and leering fiends from the darkness, and floods with light the dungeons of fear.
      All should he taught that there is no evidence of the existence of the supernatural that the man who bows before an idol of wood or stone is just as foolish as the one who prays to unimagined God, that all worship has for its foundation the same mistake the same ignorance, the same fear that it is just as foolish to believe in a personal god as in a personal devil Justas foolish to believe in great ghosts as little ones.
      So, all should be taught that the forces, the facts in Nature, cannot be controlled or changed by prayer or praise, by supplication, ceremony, or sacrifice; that there is no magic, no miracle; that force can be overcome only by force, and that the whole world is natural.
      All should be taught that man must protect himself -- that there is no power superior to Nature that cares for man that Nature has neither pity nor hatred that her forces act without the slightest regard for man that she produces without intention and destroys without regret.
      All should be taught that usefulness is the bud and flower and fruit of real religion. The popes and cardinals, the bishops, priests and parsons are all useless. They produce nothing. They live on the labor of others. They are parasites that feed on the frightened. They are vampires that suck the blood of honest toil.
Every church is an organized beggar. Every one lives on alms collected by force and fear. Every orthodox church promises heaven and threatens hell, and these promises and threats are made for the sake of alms, for revenue. Every church cries: "Believe and give."
      A new era is dawning on the world. We are beginning to believe in the religion of usefulness.
     The men who felled the forests, cultivated the earth, spanned the rivers with bridges of steel, built the railways and canals, the great ships, invented the locomotives and engines, supplying the countless wants of man: the men who invented the telegraphs and cables, and freighted the electric spark with thought and love; theme who invented the looms and spindles that clothe the world, the inventors of printing and the great presses that fill the earth with poetry, fiction and fact, that save and keep all knowledge for the children yet to be; the inventors of all the wonderful machines that deftly mold from wood and steel the things we use; the men who have explored the heavens and traced the orbits of the stars who have read the story of the world in mountain range and billowed sea; the men who have lengthened life and conquered pain; the great philosophers and naturalists who have filled the world with light; the great poets whose thoughts have charmed the souls, the great painters and sculptors who have made the canvas speak, the marble live; the great orators who have swayed the world, the composers who have given their souls to sound, the captains of industry, the producers, the soldiers who have battled for the right, the vast host of useful men these are our Christ’s, our apostles and our saints. The triumphs of science are our miracles. The books filled with the facts of Nature are our sacred scriptures, and the force that is in every atom and in every star in everything that lives and grows and thinks, that hopes and suffers, is the only possible god.
      The absolute we cannot know -- beyond the horizon of the Natural we cannot go. All our duties are within our reach -- all our obligations must be discharged here, in this world. Let us love and labor. Let us wait and work. Let us cultivate courage and cheerfulness open our hearts to the good our minds to the true. Let us live free lives. Let us hope that the future will bring peace and joy to all the children of men, and above all, lotus preserve the veracity of our souls.